What the New York Times Missed in the Kiwi Australia Migration Story

By
Chris Dodson
January 31, 2026

A recent New York Times article explored why tens of thousands of Kiwis are moving to Australia for better pay, more opportunity, and better “vibes.” What it missed is what that move means for buying a home, why home ownership often becomes possible far sooner than expected for Kiwis, and why that is the part New Zealand should be worried about.

Stay Connected

What the New York Times Missed About Kiwis Buying Homes in Australia

The New York Times recently reported on the growing number of New Zealanders moving to Australia. (Why Are New Zealanders Moving to Australia? More Money, Better Vibes – Jan 19, 2026)

New York Times weighing in on Kiwi Migration ©NYT

The numbers are stark.

The New York Times quoted that 1% of New Zealand’s population left last year.

That's more than 70,000 Kiwis leaving New Zealand in a single year.

Most of them crossed the Tasman.

The article captured the mood well.
Better pay.
More opportunity.
Better vibes.

But it missed something important.

What happens after the move?

Moving is easy. Settling is the real question.

New Zealand citizens can move to Australia almost effortlessly.

Under the Special Category Visa (subclass 444), Kiwis are treated as permanent residents for practical purposes from day one. They can live, work, and settle in Australia indefinitely.

What’s far less understood is what that status means for buying property.

And that’s where many Kiwis underestimate their position — or simply aren’t aware of what’s possible.

Some know.
Many don’t.
And when they find out, the move often becomes permanent.

That’s the part that should worry New Zealand.

A real example the headlines don’t show

Char and Eric are a married couple in their early thirties with one child.
They moved from the Waikato to Melbourne.

No one in either family had ever owned property. Within six months of arriving, they purchased a $600,000 newly renovated home in Melbourne, in a good school catchment, with dual full-time incomes and long-term security.

They were able to:

  • Use $15k each from KiwiSaver towards a deposit
  • Buy using the federal 5% Home Guarantee Scheme concession
  • Access first-home stamp duty concessions as permanent residents from arrival

All up, that’s around $60–$70k in concessions and support.

Australia didn’t just gain homeowners.

Australia gains a young family with 30+ years of economic contribution ahead — around $420k in income tax per person, or $840k+ per couple, over a working lifetime alone.
The likelihood of them returning to New Zealand has just become much smaller, and they are just one case example of tens of thousands in similar situations.

The home ownership gap

The article highlights a frustration many Kiwis know well.

People earning “above-average” incomes are still struggling to get ahead.
Saving feels slow.
Housing feels out of reach.

Even doing everything right doesn’t seem to move the needle.

Australia isn’t cheap.
But the system works differently.

Higher wages.
Stronger borrowing capacity.
More favourable income treatment by banks.

For many Kiwis, the numbers simply stack up better on this side of the ditch.

What the article doesn’t explain

This is the gap most coverage leaves out.

The article does not explain:

  • That Kiwis can buy property in Australia
  • That they don’t need to wait years to qualify
  • That many can buy with a 5% deposit, depending on structure and lender
  • That KiwiSaver can be part of a first-home strategy
  • That Australian lending rules are often more flexible than people expect

The difference isn’t income alone. It’s understanding the system and structuring things properly from day one. These concessions are intended for people who come to Australia to work, contribute, and play their part in the economy and have a 'fair go'.

This isn’t a temporary wave

The migration skews older.

People in their late 20s and 30s.
Families.
Professionals planning long-term.

These aren’t short-term movers.

These are people thinking about stability, schools, and building wealth. Home ownership quickly becomes part of the conversation.

The real takeaway

The New York Times is right about one thing.

People are chasing hope.

For many Kiwis, that hope looks like owning a home.
A place to settle.
A sense that life is moving forward again.

Australia can offer that.

But only if the rules are understood early.

And when they are, the move in search of 'hope' often becomes permanent.

That’s the part most headlines miss — and the part New Zealand should be paying close attention to. And if you want to talk through what that means for you, we’re here to help.

Chris Dodson
Founder, Mortgages Plus